Vietnam War & , Richard Nixon
Summarize the positions of the â€œhawksâ€ (pro) and the â€œdovesâ€ (anti) in the debate over the Vietnam War in the 1960s. How did each side think the U.S. got into Vietnam and how should it get out? Had your personal situation been similar then to what it is now (job, income, education, gender, etc.), which side would you have supported? Why? (Write one page answering those questions.)
This section views the positions the majority of the American peoplehad in the debate over the Vietnam War in the 1960s. There were prosand cons during the Vietnam War as depicted in the debate. There weremany cons and very few pros. To begin with, the supporters of the warsaid that first, the war made individuals forced into serving theState even if it was off beam. Second, this battle was a technique oferadicating Communism, which was wide spreading even in America.Third, it was amongst the highly televised battles in record.Finally, the war established a policy in favor of wartime reporting(Ang, 2004). On the other hand, the anti-Vietnam War followersalleged it had numerous cons. First, Nixon Richard succeeded theelection of the 1968 due to his assurance of ending the fighting.Second, the draft endangered the inferior and average class. Third,the Human Rights Lobby group along with the Liberal Speech Lobbygroup all lead to suffering onto the warfare (Allen, 2008). Fourth,University scholars brought an ethics debate toward the contributionof this battle and lead the State into thinking twice. Fifth, theState was undermined because of the taking part in not becomingconstitutionally justifiable. Lastly, the State became more indebtedsince the battle was not won (Ang, 2004).
The supporters of the war say that Americans got engaged in Vietnamfighting since it didn’t want the spread of communism. Theanti-Vietnam war followers claimed that he US went into Vietnam Warto divide the nation (Logevall, 2012). I would have supported the USgoing into war with Vietnam because of the demerits brought by war. Ithink I would have lost my job by then because the war needs morefunding and more government workers could have been laid off so as tospend more on war.
Over the last fifty years or so, Richard Nixon may have been the most controversial American President. Examine Nixonâ€™s career and accomplishments (negative and positive) and evaluate his role in modern U.S. history. For you, which was more important, the negative or the positive? Why?
Nixon Richard (born in 1913 died 1994), the 37th UnitedStates president, gets best recognized as the solitary commanderresigning from office (Reeves 2001).Richard Nixon resigned during1974, in the middle of his 2nd term, instead of facingprosecution concerning his endeavors to conceal illicit acts byindividuals in his regime in Watergate indignity. A previousRepublican congressman and the United States’ representative, heruled two times as VP underneath Eisenhower Dwight all through 1950.During 1960s, Nixon didn’t succeed his vie for presidentialposition in an extreme competition with John F Kennedy, the Democratcandidate (1917-1963). He vied for White House once more during 1968year and succeeded. As the US president, Nixon`s accomplishmentsincluded forging peaceful agreements with Chinese State with the SU,and pulling back American soldiers from a disliked combat inside ofVietnam. Conversely, Nixon`s participation inside Watergatediscolored his fame and increased American negativity of the Nixon’sgovernment (Reeves 2001).
However, Nixon Richard`s role wasn’t as helpful inside of shapingpresent day Republican Group like it was in shaping the US politics…like played by all main political groups as a whole. Nixoncomprehended politics. Nixon’s 1968 crusade was hugely founded in"orderliness" along with counter-war speech. Hecomprehended the country’s growing hostility concerning thepredicament inside Vietnam. While the majority Republicans withDemocrats tried appealing onto their philosophical foundation, Nixonstruggled to fill this gap and in addition appealed to Democrats andRepublicans. He tried appealing to moral and fiscal Conformist alongwith a number of discontented Southerners (Democrats), who becameunsatisfied with ethnic affiliations inside of the Southern part (whopreferred southerners, i.e, Democrats) (Reeves 2001).Thus from theabove explanation, I support the positive things that Nixon did sincethey helped shape the modern day US politics consructively. He is asignificant figure in US politics.
Allen, J. (2008). Vietnam: The (last) war the U.S. lost.Chicago, Ill: Haymarket Books.
Ang, C. G. (2004). Ending the Vietnam War: The Vietnamesecommunists` perspective. London: RoutledgeCurzon.
Logevall, F. (2012). Embers of war: The fall of an empire and themaking of America`s Vietnam. New York: Random House.
Reeves, Richard. 2001. President Nixon: alone in the White House.New York: Simon & Schuster.