HERE are some of the points considered by Don Maruska to be effective in decision which may in some point be connected to the solution that pertains to the statement mentioned above: 1. discover shared hopes rather than differing problems This makes the decision-makers more optimistic considering the fact that there is still hope that the problem would be overcome by the entire organization thus giving every individual a chance to further better themselves for the sake of the entire organization as well.
2. look ahead Looking ahead to the future to what the solutions may particularly bring the organization in the coming years of the operation of the business would naturally bring forth different beneficial results for the business as it is. 3. Stay charged up A decision-maker should remain obviously strong and always ready in terms of the different results of the decisions of the said individuals for the business.
Through this, even though things may not turn out fine at first, everything would become much easier if the decision-makers are much stronger in their stand in remaining in the decisions that they have made. From the points enlisted above, it could be observed that the major concern of the idea that the different issues concerned within the situation being dealt with by the administration is carefully outlined and included within the process of assessment of the possible solutions to be served.
Undeniably though, since the administrational personnel are already too much involved within the problem, they are at times having a hard time becoming highly objective about the situation. Instead, they become more subjective as they also have different personal values that are included within the issues that they are faced with. Because of this, their reasoning and their logical view of the situation becomes pessimistic resulting to weaker basis of solutions.
This is the primary reason why it is sometimes essential to consider the ideas of those who are not likely involved within the issues that are dealt with in the organization. They are the ones to serve as the third party who could likely give considerable solutions that are more objective than that of the solutions that could be given by those involved. As for example, when dealing with compensation increase issues, involving just the employees and employers view might not be as helpful as expected in deriving an effective solution that may be likely helpful in the situation.
Whereas, when involving a third party, such as an investor of the organization or simply an adviser of the organization would increase the capability of the ones involved in the issue to face the situation in much objectiveness. With the example given above, it has been pointed out that it is true that people who are not involved in the situation are the ones who are most likely more capable of seeing the problem in a balanced view that could be both applicable and efficient for finding the solution needed to face the situation.
The constancy of carrying the opinions of those not involved may not be as effective as seen by those who are likely involved in the problem. However, it could not be denied that from experiential application of the process, the effectiveness of the decision-making through this procedure is rather factual and practical for business administrational organizations to take into seriousness of application. The complications of business issues sometimes makes the thinking of the ones involved focused on their own values.
Because of this, being subjective on the process is much more obvious than that of the possibility of making the situation work for all the stakeholders of the problem. Finding solution in this manner for decision making may not be as helpful and efficient as it may seem. The inclusion of the opinion of the ones outside of the picture would likely help in the efficiency of the solutions derived from meetings and assessments of the situation being dealt with.
With the view of the ones who are not included in the benefits and the limits of the situation, the problem could be well seen through a bird’s eye view that would make the problem much easier to deal with since the situation is being seen clearly with objectiveness. Reference: Don Maruska. (2003). How Great Decisions Get Made: 10 Easy Steps for Reaching Agreement on Even the Toughest Issues. American Management Association.